You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Providing information about options in patient decision aids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deb Feldman-Stewart, Mary Ann O’Brien, Marla L Clayman, B Joyce Davison, Masahito Jimbo, Michel Labrecque, Richard W Martin, Heather Shepherd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 34% |
| Psychology | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,565,655
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,126
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,762
of 310,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.