↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis of the efficacy of pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis of the efficacy of pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-11-311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinbao Xu, Hui Zhang, Ping Zhou, Lei Chen

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) versus standard PD in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, with the hope of providing evidence for clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 8 31%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 58%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,659,519
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#121
of 2,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,025
of 320,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.