↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1846-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin-lin Zhu, Jian-ying Zhou, Ling Luo, Xiang Wang, Jia-xi Peng, Sha-sha Chen, Hai-Yan Yin, Qiao-Feng Wu, Cheng-shun Zhang, Peng Lv, Yong Tang, Shu-guang Yu

Abstract

Conventional moxibustion is a representative non-drug intervention in traditional Chinese medicine, and it has been reported to produce encouraging results and benefits in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in previous clinical trials and systematic reviews. Given that increasing concerns on the safety of generated smoke from conventional moxibustion have received much attention, smoke-free moxibustion is regarded as a potential alternative. However, whether smoke-free moxibustion would display a similar efficacy to that of conventional moxibustion still remains unclear. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial attempts to investigate the difference of efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion in patients with KOA. This is a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 138 eligible participants with KOA will be randomly allocated to two groups (conventional moxibustion group and smoke-free moxibustion group) in seven hospitals in China. Participants will receive 12 sessions of moxibustion treatment at three acupoints (EX-LE4, ST35, and ST36) over a period of 4 weeks (3 sessions per week). A smoke-removing device is placed at the top of the moxibustion device for the smoke-free moxibustion group (n = 69), while the conventional moxibustion group (n = 69) is treated with traditional moxibustion. The primary outcome measure will be the change of the global scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from the baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the visual analog scale VASand Patient Global Assessment scores. Follow-up measurements will be performed on the 8th and 12th weeks after random allocation. This study will contribute to providing a solid foundation for the selection of moxibustion in clinical application as well as future research in moxibustion therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02772055 . Registered on 12 May 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 37 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 22%
Psychology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 38 40%