↓ Skip to main content

Development of HomeSTEAD’s physical activity and screen time physical environment inventory

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of HomeSTEAD’s physical activity and screen time physical environment inventory
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek Hales, Amber E Vaughn, Stephanie Mazzucca, Maria J Bryant, Rachel G Tabak, Christina McWilliams, June Stevens, Dianne S Ward

Abstract

The home environment has a significant influence on children's physical activity, sedentary behavior, dietary intake, and risk for obesity and chronic disease. Our understanding of the most influential factors and how they interact and impact child behavior is limited by current measurement tools, specifically the lack of a comprehensive instrument. HomeSTEAD (the Home Self-administered Tool for Environmental assessment of Activity and Diet) was designed to address this gap. This new tool contains four sections: home physical activity and media equipment inventory, family physical activity and screen time practices, home food inventory, and family food practices. This paper will describe HomeSTEAD's development and present reliability and validity evidence for the first section.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 251 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 25%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 3%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 50 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 45 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 13%
Social Sciences 26 10%
Sports and Recreations 21 8%
Psychology 20 8%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 66 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,357,514
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,844
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,749
of 306,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#40
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.