↓ Skip to main content

Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination?
Published in
BMC Medical Education, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang A Blank, Hannes Blankenfeld, Roger Vogelmann, Klaus Linde, Antonius Schneider

Abstract

Students in German medical schools frequently complain that the subject 'clinical examination' is not taught in a satisfying manner due to time constraints and lack of personnel resources. While the effectiveness and efficiency of practice-oriented teaching in small groups using near-peer teaching has been shown, it is rarely used in German medical schools. We investigated whether adding a new near-peer teaching course developed with student input plus patient examination under supervision in small groups improves basic clinical examination skills in third year medical students compared to a traditional clinical examination course alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Lecturer 7 7%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 52%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,982,712
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,233
of 4,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,562
of 322,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.