You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of excess fluid balance on the mortality rate of surgical patients: a multicenter prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
João M Silva, Amanda Maria RibasRosa de Oliveira, Fernando Augusto Mendes Nogueira, Pedro Monferrari Monteiro Vianna, Marcos Cruz Pereira Filho, Leandro Ferreira Dias, Vivian Paz Leão Maia, Cesar de Souza Neucamp, Cristina Prata Amendola, Maria Jose Carvalho Carmona, Luiz M Sá Malbouisson |
| Abstract |
In some studies including small populations of patients undergoing specific surgery, an intraoperative liberal infusion of fluids was associated with increasing morbidity when compared to restrictive strategies. Therefore, to evaluate the role of excessive fluid infusion in a general population with high-risk surgery is very important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intraoperative fluid balance on the postoperative organ dysfunction, infection and mortality rate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 23% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,277,201
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,998
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,196
of 320,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.