↓ Skip to main content

Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Bluth, R. Teichmann, T. Kiss, I. Bobek, J. Canet, G. Cinnella, L. De Baerdemaeker, C. Gregoretti, G. Hedenstierna, S. N. Hemmes, M. Hiesmayr, M. W. Hollmann, S. Jaber, J. G. Laffey, M. J. Licker, K. Markstaller, I. Matot, G. Müller, G. H. Mills, J. P. Mulier, C. Putensen, R. Rossaint, J. Schmitt, M. Senturk, A. Serpa Neto, P. Severgnini, J. Sprung, M. F. Vidal Melo, H. Wrigge, M. J. Schultz, P. Pelosi, M. Gama de Abreu, for the PROBESE investigators, and the PROtective VEntilation Network (PROVEnet), on behalf of the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA)

Abstract

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamics, and the effects on PPCs are uncertain. We hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using high PEEP with periodic recruitment maneuvers, as compared with low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients. The PRotective Ventilation with Higher versus Lower PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery in OBESE Patients (PROBESE) study is a multicenter, two-arm, international randomized controlled trial. In total, 2013 obese patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2) scheduled for at least 2 h of surgery under general anesthesia and at intermediate to high risk for PPCs will be included. Patients are ventilated intraoperatively with a low tidal volume of 7 ml/kg (predicted body weight) and randomly assigned to PEEP of 12 cmH2O with lung recruitment maneuvers (high PEEP) or PEEP of 4 cmH2O without recruitment maneuvers (low PEEP). The occurrence of PPCs will be recorded as collapsed composite of single adverse pulmonary events and represents the primary endpoint. To our knowledge, the PROBESE trial is the first multicenter, international randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two different levels of intraoperative PEEP during protective low tidal volume ventilation on PPCs in obese patients. The results of the PROBESE trial will support anesthesiologists in their decision to choose a certain PEEP level during general anesthesia for surgery in obese patients in an attempt to prevent PPCs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02148692. Registered on 23 May 2014; last updated 7 June 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Other 18 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Professor 12 8%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 45 30%