↓ Skip to main content

The landscape of BRAF transcript and protein variants in human cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The landscape of BRAF transcript and protein variants in human cancer
Published in
Molecular Cancer, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12943-017-0645-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Marranci, Zhijie Jiang, Marianna Vitiello, Elena Guzzolino, Laura Comelli, Samanta Sarti, Simone Lubrano, Cinzia Franchin, Ileabett Echevarría-Vargas, Andrea Tuccoli, Alberto Mercatanti, Monica Evangelista, Paolo Sportoletti, Giorgio Cozza, Ettore Luzi, Enrico Capobianco, Jessie Villanueva, Giorgio Arrigoni, Giovanni Signore, Silvia Rocchiccioli, Letizia Pitto, Nicholas Tsinoremas, Laura Poliseno

Abstract

The BRAF protein kinase is widely studied as a cancer driver and therapeutic target. However, the regulation of its expression is not completely understood. Taking advantage of the RNA-seq data of more than 4800 patients belonging to 9 different cancer types, we show that BRAF mRNA exists as a pool of 3 isoforms (reference BRAF, BRAF-X1, and BRAF-X2) that differ in the last part of their coding sequences, as well as in the length (BRAF-ref: 76 nt; BRAF-X1 and BRAF-X2: up to 7 kb) and in the sequence of their 3'UTRs. The expression levels of BRAF-ref and BRAF-X1/X2 are inversely correlated, while the most prevalent among the three isoforms varies from cancer type to cancer type. In melanoma cells, the X1 isoform is expressed at the highest level in both therapy-naïve cells and cells with acquired resistance to vemurafenib driven by BRAF gene amplification or expression of the Δ[3-10] splicing variant. In addition to the BRAF-ref protein, the BRAF-X1 protein (the full length as well as the Δ[3-10] variant) is also translated. The expression levels of the BRAF-ref and BRAF-X1 proteins are similar, and together they account for BRAF functional activities. In contrast, the endogenous BRAF-X2 protein is hard to detect because the C-terminal domain is selectively recognized by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and targeted for degradation. By shedding light on the repertoire of BRAF mRNA and protein variants, and on the complex regulation of their expression, our work paves the way to a deeper understanding of a crucially important player in human cancer and to a more informed development of new therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#13,551,243
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#835
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,559
of 310,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.