↓ Skip to main content

What on earth is APRV?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What on earth is APRV?
Published in
Critical Care, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc9419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dietrich Henzler

Abstract

Partial ventilatory support modalities are ill defined and different perceptions about these modes might depend on geographic region. Exemplary on two recent publications investigating airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) in an adult ICU population, the question is investigated whether research in ventilation modes can be performed with the current definitions. The lack of precise definitions precludes drawing meaningful conclusions from these studies, as it remains unclear how these patients were actually ventilated and whether or how much spontaneous breathing was factitiously preserved. An argument is made to develop a new taxonomy of ventilation modes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 17%
Other 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,607,035
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,174
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,339
of 193,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.