↓ Skip to main content

What is the evidence for the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation? A systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is the evidence for the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation? A systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0088-9
Authors

Samantha H. Cheng, Sofia Ahlroth, Stefanie Onder, Priya Shyamsundar, Ruth Garside, Patti Kristjanson, Madeleine C. McKinnon, Daniel C. Miller

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 63 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 7%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 74 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,283,095
of 26,571,932 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#87
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,807
of 329,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.