↓ Skip to main content

Ambulatory oxygen in fibrotic lung disease (AmbOx): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ambulatory oxygen in fibrotic lung disease (AmbOx): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1912-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dina Visca, Vicky Tsipouri, Letizia Mori, Ashi Firouzi, Sharon Fleming, Morag Farquhar, Elizabeth Leung, Toby M. Maher, Paul Cullinan, Nick Hopkinson, Athol U. Wells, Winston Banya, Jennifer A. Whitty, Huzaifa Adamali, Lisa G. Spencer, Piersante Sestini, Elisabetta A. Renzoni

Abstract

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are chronic and often progressive conditions resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Shortness of breath, a symptom often linked to oxygen desaturation on exertion, is tightly linked to worsening quality of life in these patients. Although ambulatory oxygen is used empirically in their treatment, there are no ILD-specific guidelines on its use. To our knowledge, no studies are available on the effects of ambulatory oxygen on day-to-day life in patients with ILD. Ambulatory oxygen in fibrotic lung disease (AmbOx) is a multicentre, randomised controlled crossover trial (RCT) funded by the Research for Patient Benefit Programme of the National Institute for Health Research. The trial will compare ambulatory oxygen used during daily activities with no ambulatory oxygen in patients with fibrotic lung disease whose oxygen saturation (SaO2) is ≥94% at rest, but drops to ≤88% on a 6-min Walk Test. The randomised controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the effects on health status (measured by the King's Brief ILD Questionnaire: K-BILD) of ambulatory oxygen used at home, at an optimal flow rate determined by titration at screening visit, and administered for a 2-week period, compared to 2 weeks off oxygen. Key secondary outcomes will include breathlessness on activity scores, as measured by the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, global patient assessment of change scores, as well as quality of life scores (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire), anxiety and depression scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), activity markers measured by SenseWear Armbands, pulse oximetry measurements, patient-reported daily activities, patient- and oxygen company-reported oxygen cylinder use. The study also includes a qualitative component and will explore in interviews patients' experiences of the use of a portable oxygen supply and trial participation in a subgroup of 20 patients and carers. This is the first RCT of the effects of ambulatory oxygen during daily life on health status and breathlessness in fibrotic lung disease. The results generated should provide the basis for setting up ILD-specific guidelines for the use of ambulatory oxygen. National Clinical Trials Registry, identifier: NCT02286063 . Registered on 8 October 2014 (retrospectively registered).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 34 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 32 36%