You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frameworks for evaluating health research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-11-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan Boyd, Donald C Cole, Dan-Bi Cho, Garry Aslanyan, Imelda Bates |
| Abstract |
Health research capacity strengthening (RCS) projects are often complex and hard to evaluate. In order to inform health RCS evaluation efforts, we aimed to describe and compare key characteristics of existing health RCS evaluation frameworks: their process of development, purpose, target users, structure, content and coverage of important evaluation issues. A secondary objective was to explore what use had been made of the ESSENCE framework, which attempts to address one such issue: harmonising the evaluation requirements of different funders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,268,411
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#297
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,339
of 321,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.