↓ Skip to main content

Improving the oral bioavailability of beneficial polyphenols through designed synergies

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the oral bioavailability of beneficial polyphenols through designed synergies
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12263-009-0148-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjan Scheepens, Kee Tan, James W. Paxton

Abstract

A substantial and growing consumer demand exists for plant-based functional foods that improve general health and wellbeing. Amongst consumed phytochemicals, the polyphenolic compounds tend to be the most bioactive. Many commonly consumed polyphenols have been shown to have specific and potent health-promoting activities when assessed by high-throughput in vitro assays and when administered to experimental animals by injection. However, very few have been shown to have any beneficial effects in animals or man when orally consumed, because of the poor bioavailability exhibited by most polyphenols following the ingestion. Consumed polyphenols, like most pharmaceuticals, are regarded as xenobiotics by the body and must overcome many barriers, including extensive enzymatic and chemical modification during digestion and absorption, to reach their site(s) of action. This is especially true for polyphenols targeting the brain, which is protected by the tightly regulated blood-brain barrier. Interestingly, many polyphenols are also known to specifically modify some of the metabolic and transport processes that govern bioavailability. Therefore, the opportunity exists to increase the bioactivity of beneficial polyphenols by designing specific synergistic interactions with polyphenols that improve their oral bioavailability. This hypothesis and review paper will discuss some of the endogenous systems that limit the bioavailability of ingested polyphenols to the body and the brain, and the means by which bioavailability may be improved by specifically designing synergies between orally consumed polyphenols.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 8%
Chemistry 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,213,623
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#349
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,633
of 93,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.