↓ Skip to main content

Ten years of the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten years of the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13023-017-0635-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Muenzer, Simon A. Jones, Anna Tylki-Szymańska, Paul Harmatz, Nancy J. Mendelsohn, Nathalie Guffon, Roberto Giugliani, Barbara K. Burton, Maurizio Scarpa, Michael Beck, Yvonne Jangelind, Elizabeth Hernberg-Stahl, Maria Paabøl Larsen, Tom Pulles, David A. H. Whiteman

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome; OMIM 309900) is a rare lysosomal storage disease with progressive multisystem manifestations caused by deficient activity of the enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase. Disease-specific treatment is available in the form of enzyme replacement therapy with intravenous idursulfase (Elaprase®, Shire). Since 2005, the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS) has collected real-world, long-term data on the safety and effectiveness of this therapy, as well as the natural history of MPS II. Individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of MPS II who are untreated or who are receiving/have received treatment with idursulfase or bone marrow transplant can be enrolled in HOS. A broad range of disease- and treatment-related information is captured in the registry and, over the past decade, data from more than 1000 patients from 124 clinics in 29 countries have been collected. Evidence generated from HOS has helped to improve our understanding of disease progression in both treated and untreated patients and has extended findings from the formal clinical trials of idursulfase. As a long-term, global, observational registry, various challenges relating to data collection, entry, and analysis have been encountered. These have resulted in changes to the HOS database platform, and novel approaches to maximize the value of the information collected will also be needed in the future. The continued evolution of the registry should help to ensure that HOS provides further insights into the burden of the disease and patient care and management in the coming years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 24 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,340,076
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#857
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,746
of 310,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.