You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-11-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela Rocchi, Shoghag Khoudigian, Rob Hopkins, Ron Goeree |
| Abstract |
Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada's Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR with other HTA or regulatory agencies regarding surrogate concerns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#306
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,744
of 307,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.