↓ Skip to main content

Organising health research systems as a key to improving health: the World Health Report 2013 and how to make further progress

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organising health research systems as a key to improving health: the World Health Report 2013 and how to make further progress
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-11-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen R Hanney, Miguel A González-Block

Abstract

The World Health Report 2013 provides a major boost to the health research community and, in particular, to those who believe that health research will make its greatest impact on improving health when it is organised through a systems approach. The World Health Report 2013, Research for Universal Health Coverage, starts with three key messages. Firstly, that universal health coverage, with full access to high-quality services, needs research evidence if it is to be achieved; second, all nations should conduct and use research; and finally, the report states that systems are needed to develop national research agendas, to raise funds, to strengthen research capacity, and to make effective use of research findings. Each of these themes is elaborated in the report and supported by extensive references.In this editorial, we first outline the key messages from the World Health Report 2013 and highlight the contributions made by papers from our journal, Health Research Policy and Systems. In addition, we discuss very recent papers that advance some issues even further. In particular, we consider new evidence both on how to achieve financial protection for those who use health services, and on whether healthcare professionals and organisations who engage in research provide an improved healthcare performance. Finally, we propose additional perspectives that add to the impressive body of evidence and analyses presented in the report. Specifically, we suggest that considering the needs of various stakeholders, as attempted in the UK, in parallel with analysing how to fulfil essential functions, should boost the prospects of successfully building and strengthening health research systems. This is important because research is vital for achieving universal health coverage, and consequently for improving the health of millions of people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 2%
Ghana 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 79 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Social Sciences 18 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,514,335
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#499
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,712
of 299,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.