You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Causes of death in asthma, COPD and non-respiratory hospitalized patients: a multicentric study”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2466-13-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Gregorio Soto-Campos, Vicente Plaza, Joan B Soriano, Carlos Cabrera-López, Carlos Almonacid-Sánchez, Rosa Vazquez-Oliva, Jose Serrano, Aitor Ballaz-Quincoces, Alicia Padilla-Galo, Vanessa Santos, Grupo Emergente de Asma (GEA) del Área de Asma de la SEPAR |
| Abstract |
There is limited information on the causes of death in asthma patients.To determine the causes of death in hospitalized asthmatic patients and to compare with those observed in COPD patients and non-respiratory individuals, with a particular interest in associations with previous cardiovascular disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 16% |
| Chile | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 28% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,531,102
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#68
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,880
of 312,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.