↓ Skip to main content

Antitumor activity of photodynamic therapy performed with nanospheres containing zinc-phthalocyanine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antitumor activity of photodynamic therapy performed with nanospheres containing zinc-phthalocyanine
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-3155-11-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flávia Arruda Portilho, Cláudio Eduardo deOliveira Cavalcanti, Ana Luisa Miranda-Vilela, Luciana Landim Carneiro Estevanato, João Paulo Figueiró Longo, Maria deFátimaMenezes Almeida Santos, Anamélia Lorenzetti Bocca, Olímpia Paschoal Martins, Andreza R Simioni, Paulo César Morais, Ricardo Bentes Azevedo, Antonio Claudio Tedesco, Zulmira GuerreroMarques Lacava

Abstract

The increasing incidence of cancer and the search for more effective therapies with minimal collateral effects have prompted studies to find alternative new treatments. Among these, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been proposed as a very promising new modality in cancer treatment with the lowest rates of side effects, revealing itself to be particularly successful when the photosensitizer is associated with nanoscaled carriers. This study aimed to design and develop a new formulation based on albumin nanospheres containing zinc-phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (ZnPcS4-AN) for use in the PDT protocol and to investigate its antitumor activity in Swiss albino mice using the Ehrlich solid tumor as an experimental model for breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Chemistry 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2015.
All research outputs
#13,904,244
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#470
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,751
of 307,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.