You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13017-017-0132-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Sartelli, Fausto Catena, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Luca Ansaloni, Walter L. Biffl, Marja A. Boermeester, Marco Ceresoli, Osvaldo Chiara, Federico Coccolini, Jan J. De Waele, Salomone Di Saverio, Christian Eckmann, Gustavo P. Fraga, Maddalena Giannella, Massimo Girardis, Ewen A. Griffiths, Jeffry Kashuk, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vladimir Khokha, Yoram Kluger, Francesco M. Labricciosa, Ari Leppaniemi, Ronald V. Maier, Addison K. May, Mark Malangoni, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, John Mazuski, Philippe Montravers, Andrew Peitzman, Bruno M. Pereira, Tarcisio Reis, Boris Sakakushev, Gabriele Sganga, Kjetil Soreide, Michael Sugrue, Jan Ulrych, Jean-Louis Vincent, Pierluigi Viale, Ernest E. Moore |
| Abstract |
This paper reports on the consensus conference on the management of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) which was held on July 23, 2016, in Dublin, Ireland, as a part of the annual World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) meeting. This document covers all aspects of the management of IAIs. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendation is used, and this document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference findings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Romania | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 329 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 73 | 22% |
| Unknown | 93 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 166 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 117 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#901,198
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#22
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,744
of 314,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.