↓ Skip to main content

Impact of dietary fiber intake on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of dietary fiber intake on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry
Published in
Nutrition Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Fujii, Masanori Iwase, Toshiaki Ohkuma, Shinako Ogata-Kaizu, Hitoshi Ide, Yohei Kikuchi, Yasuhiro Idewaki, Tamaki Joudai, Yoichiro Hirakawa, Kazuhiro Uchida, Satoshi Sasaki, Udai Nakamura, Takanari Kitazono

Abstract

Dietary fiber is beneficial for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, although it is consumed differently in ethnic foods around the world. We investigated the association between dietary fiber intake and obesity, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 439 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 115 26%
Student > Master 76 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 9%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 111 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 92 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 37 8%
Unknown 128 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,192,517
of 25,189,292 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#340
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,983
of 321,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,189,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.