You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcome effectiveness of the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle with addition of lactate clearance as a bundle item: a multi-national evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10469 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H Bryant Nguyen, Win Sen Kuan, Michael Batech, Pinak Shrikhande, Malcolm Mahadevan, Chih-Huang Li, Sumit Ray, Anna Dengel, the ATLAS (Asia Network to Regulate Sepsis care) Investigators |
| Abstract |
Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines has been associated with improved outcome in patients with severe sepsis. Resolution of lactate elevations or lactate clearance has also been shown to be associated with outcome. The purpose of the present study was to examine the compliance and effectiveness of the SSC resuscitation bundle with the addition of lactate clearance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 24% |
| Unknown | 28 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,042
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,358
of 142,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.