↓ Skip to main content

Hemodynamic variables and progression of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with severe sepsis: data from the prospective observational FINNAKI study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemodynamic variables and progression of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with severe sepsis: data from the prospective observational FINNAKI study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meri Poukkanen, Erika Wilkman, Suvi T Vaara, Ville Pettilä, Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen, Anna-Maija Korhonen, Ari Uusaro, Seppo Hovilehto, Outi Inkinen, Raili Laru-Sompa, Raku Hautamäki, Anne Kuitunen, Sari Karlsson, the FINNAKI Study Group

Abstract

Knowledge of the association of hemodynamics with progression of septic acute kidney injury (AKI) is limited. However, some recent data suggest that mean arterial pressure (MAP) exceeding current guidelines (60-65 mmHg) may be needed to prevent AKI. We hypothesized that higher MAP during the first 24 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU), would be associated with a lower risk of progression of AKI in patients with severe sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 176 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,994
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,978
of 320,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#43
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.