You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Relative geographic range of sibling species of host damselflies does not reliably predict differential parasitism by water mites
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-13-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia J Mlynarek, Wayne Knee, Mark R Forbes |
Abstract |
One of the main challenges in evolutionary parasitology is to determine the factors that explain variation among host species in parasitism. In this study, we addressed whether host phylogeny or ecology was important in determining host species use by water mites. Parasitism (prevalence and intensity) by Arrenurus water mites was examined in relation to geographic distribution of host damselflies from sibling species pairs. In addition, the likelihood of putative mite species parasitizing both species of a host species pair was explored. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Mexico | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 26% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 53% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,091,226
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,547
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,573
of 320,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#35
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.