↓ Skip to main content

Lateral nasal osteotomy: a comparative study between the use of osteotome and a diamond surgical burr - a cadaver study

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lateral nasal osteotomy: a comparative study between the use of osteotome and a diamond surgical burr - a cadaver study
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-160x-9-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alireza Ghassemi, Ashraf Ayoub, Ali Modabber, Behnam Bohluli, Andreas Prescher

Abstract

The ultimate goal of rhinoplasty is to achieve a controllable, reliable and an aesthetically pleasing result. Various approaches and instruments have been introduced for the correction of the bony walls of the nose to improve predictability of the procedure and to minimize the associated trauma. We conducted a cadaveric study comparing the results of osteotomy of the nasal wall using a diamond surgical burr with those using a 2-mm osteotome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 60%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,357,514
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#184
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,730
of 306,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.