You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Hélène Milot, Steven J Spencer, Vicky Chan, James P Allington, Julius Klein, Cathy Chou, James E Bobrow, Steven C Cramer, David J Reinkensmeyer |
| Abstract |
To date, the limited degrees of freedom (DOF) of most robotic training devices hinders them from providing functional training following stroke. We developed a 6-DOF exoskeleton ("BONES") that allows movement of the upper limb to assist in rehabilitation. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the impact of training with BONES on function of the affected upper limb, and to assess whether multijoint functional robotic training would translate into greater gains in arm function than single joint robotic training also conducted with BONES. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 87 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 71 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,074,004
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#144
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,166
of 320,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.