You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High protein intake is associated with low prevalence of frailty among old Japanese women: a multicenter cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-164 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Satomi Kobayashi, Keiko Asakura, Hitomi Suga, Satoshi Sasaki, the Three-generation Study of Women on Diets and Health Study Group |
Abstract |
Protein intake has been inversely associated with frailty. However, no study has examined the effect of the difference of protein sources (animal or plant) or the amino acid composing the protein on frailty. Therefore, we examined the association of protein and amino acid intakes with frailty among elderly Japanese women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 208 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
Researcher | 27 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
Other | 44 | 21% |
Unknown | 46 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 10% |
Unknown | 60 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,664,300
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#430
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,610
of 312,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.