↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in avoidance behavior after perceiving potential risk in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex differences in avoidance behavior after perceiving potential risk in mice
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12993-017-0126-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sayaka Yokota, Yusuke Suzuki, Keigo Hamami, Akiko Harada, Shoji Komai

Abstract

Sex has been considered as a potential factor regulating individual behaviors in different contexts. Recently, findings on sex differences in the neuroendocrine circuit have expanded due to exact measurements and control of neuronal activity, while findings on sex differences in behavioral phenotypes are limited. One efficient way to determine the miscellaneous aspects of a sexually different behavior is to segment it into a set of simpler responses induced by discrete scenes. In the present study, we conducted a battery of behavioral tests within a variety of unique risky scenes, to determine where and how sex differences arise in responses under those scenes. A significant sex difference was observed in the avoidance responses measured in the two-way active and the passive avoidance tests. The phenotype observed was higher mobility in male mice and reduced mobility in female mice, and required associative learning between an escapable risk and its predictive cue. This was limited in other scenes where escapable risk or predictive cue or both were missing. Taken together, the present study found that the primary sex difference occurs in mobility in the avoidance response after perceiving escapable risks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 29%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Psychology 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#12,843,597
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#161
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,055
of 310,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.