↓ Skip to main content

Sensitive multiplex PCR assay to differentiate Lyme spirochetes and emerging pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensitive multiplex PCR assay to differentiate Lyme spirochetes and emerging pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti
Published in
BMC Microbiology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-13-295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamfai Chan, Salvatore AE Marras, Nikhat Parveen

Abstract

The infection with Borrelia burgdorferi can result in acute to chronic Lyme disease. In addition, coinfection with tick-borne pathogens, Babesia species and Anaplasma phagocytophilum has been increasing in endemic regions of the USA and Europe. The currently used serological diagnostic tests are often difficult to interpret and, moreover, antibodies against the pathogens persist for a long time making it difficult to confirm the cure of the disease. In addition, these tests cannot be used for diagnosis of early disease state before the adaptive immune response is established. Since nucleic acids of the pathogens do not persist after the cure, DNA-based diagnostic tests are becoming highly useful for detecting infectious diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 3 3%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,160,532
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#451
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,932
of 306,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#18
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.