You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Botanical ethnoveterinary therapies in three districts of the Lesser Himalayas of Pakistan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-9-84 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arshad Mehmood Abbasi, Shujaul Mulk Khan, Mushtaq Ahmad, Mir Ajab Khan, Cassandra Leah Quave, Andrea Pieroni |
| Abstract |
Ethnoveterinary knowledge is highly significant for persistence of traditional community-based approaches to veterinary care. This is of particular importance in the context of developing and emerging countries, where animal health (that of livestock, especially) is crucial to local economies and food security. The current survey documents the traditional veterinary uses of medicinal plants in the Lesser Himalayas-Pakistan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 58 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,904,244
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#456
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,660
of 306,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.