↓ Skip to main content

Ethnobotanical survey of cooling herbal drinks from southern China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnobotanical survey of cooling herbal drinks from southern China
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujing Liu, Selena Ahmed, Chunlin Long

Abstract

Liáng chá ("cooling tea", "herbal tea" or "cool tisane" in Chinese) are herbal drinks widely produced in southern China and consumed by billions of people worldwide to prevent and treat internal heat as well as a range of associated health conditions. Globalization and renewed interest in botanical remedies has attracted growing attention in cooling herbal drinks by industry, scientists and consumers. However, there is a knowledge gap on the plant species used and commercialized for cooling herbal drinks in southern China and their associated ethnobotanical use, habitat and conservation status. This is the first study to document plant species used and commercialized as liáng chá in southern China's Lingnan region and associated ethnomedical function, preparation methods, habitat and conservation status.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,352,713
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#150
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,884
of 310,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.