You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
A survey of Australian chiropractors’ attitudes and beliefs about evidence-based practice and their use of research literature and clinical practice guidelines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-709x-21-44 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruce F Walker, Norman J Stomski, Jeff J Hebert, Simon D French |
Abstract |
Research into chiropractors' use of evidence in clinical practice appears limited to a single small qualitative study. The paucity of research in this area suggests that it is timely to undertake a more extensive study to build a more detailed understanding of the factors that influence chiropractors' adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) principles. This study aimed to identify Australian chiropractors' attitudes and beliefs towards EBP in clinical practice, and also examine their use of research literature and clinical practice guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 24% |
Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 28% |
Philosophy | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |