You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Divergent transcription is associated with promoters of transcriptional regulators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-914 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cyrille Lepoivre, Mohamed Belhocine, Aurélie Bergon, Aurélien Griffon, Miriam Yammine, Laurent Vanhille, Joaquin Zacarias-Cabeza, Marc-Antoine Garibal, Frederic Koch, Muhammad Ahmad Maqbool, Romain Fenouil, Beatrice Loriod, Hélène Holota, Marta Gut, Ivo Gut, Jean Imbert, Jean-Christophe Andrau, Denis Puthier, Salvatore Spicuglia |
| Abstract |
Divergent transcription is a wide-spread phenomenon in mammals. For instance, short bidirectional transcripts are a hallmark of active promoters, while longer transcripts can be detected antisense from active genes in conditions where the RNA degradation machinery is inhibited. Moreover, many described long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcribed antisense from coding gene promoters. However, the general significance of divergent lncRNA/mRNA gene pair transcription is still poorly understood. Here, we used strand-specific RNA-seq with high sequencing depth to thoroughly identify antisense transcripts from coding gene promoters in primary mouse tissues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 27% |
| Researcher | 39 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,798,343
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,021
of 10,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,387
of 306,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#57
of 456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.