You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining mental illnesses: can values and objectivity get along?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-346 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominic Sisti, Michael Young, Arthur Caplan |
| Abstract |
The creation of each edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of psychiatry has proven enormously controversial. The current effort to revise the 'bible' of disorder definitions for the field of mental health is no exception. The controversy around DSM-5 reached a crescendo with the announcement from National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) that the institute would focus efforts on the development of their own psychiatric nosology, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) (NIMH, 2013). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 53% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 35% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,853,089
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#643
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,424
of 322,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#7
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.