↓ Skip to main content

Chinese social media reaction to the MERS-CoV and avian influenza A(H7N9) outbreaks

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese social media reaction to the MERS-CoV and avian influenza A(H7N9) outbreaks
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-9957-2-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isaac Chun-Hai Fung, King-Wa Fu, Yuchen Ying, Braydon Schaible, Yi Hao, Chung-Hong Chan, Zion Tsz-Ho Tse

Abstract

As internet and social media use have skyrocketed, epidemiologists have begun to use online data such as Google query data and Twitter trends to track the activity levels of influenza and other infectious diseases. In China, Weibo is an extremely popular microblogging site that is equivalent to Twitter. Capitalizing on the wealth of public opinion data contained in posts on Weibo, this study used Weibo as a measure of the Chinese people's reactions to two different outbreaks: the 2012 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak, and the 2013 outbreak of human infection of avian influenza A(H7N9) in China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Computer Science 20 15%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 29 21%