↓ Skip to main content

Unpacking the psychiatric advance directive in low-resource settings: an exploratory qualitative study in Tamil Nadu, India

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unpacking the psychiatric advance directive in low-resource settings: an exploratory qualitative study in Tamil Nadu, India
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-7-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura S Shields, Soumitra Pathare, Selina DM van Zelst, Sophie Dijkkamp, Lakshmi Narasimhan, Joske GF Bunders

Abstract

Psychiatric advance directives, a tool to document preferences for care in advance of decisional incapacity, have been shown to benefit persons with mental illness in a number of countries through improving medication adherence, reducing symptoms from escalating in a crisis, accelerating recovery, and enhancing service user autonomy. While concepts such as autonomy are important in a number of high-income country settings, it remains unclear whether tools like psychiatric advance directives are suitable in a different context. The recent introduction of the psychiatric advance directive into draft legislation in India prompts the question as to how feasible psychiatric advance directives are in the Indian context. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and utility of PADs in India, with a focus on the need for individual control over decision making and barriers to implementation, by exploring views of its central stakeholders, service users and carers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 25%