↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome analysis of primary monocytes from HIV-positive patients with differential responses to antiretroviral therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptome analysis of primary monocytes from HIV-positive patients with differential responses to antiretroviral therapy
Published in
Virology Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-10-361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Qin Wu, Tara Ruth Sassé, Monica Miranda Saksena, Nitin K Saksena

Abstract

Despite the significant contributions of monocytes to HIV persistence, the HIV-monocyte interaction remains elusive. For patients on antiretroviral therapy, previous studies observed a virological suppression rate of >70% and suggested complete viral suppression as the primary goal. Although some studies have reported genetic dysregulations associated with HIV disease progression, research on ex vivo-derived monocytic transcriptomes from HIV+ patients with differential responses to therapy is limited. This study investigated the monocytic transcriptome distinctions between patients with sustained virus suppression and those with virological failure during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,137,449
of 6,230,816 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#197
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,793
of 143,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#15
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,230,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.