↓ Skip to main content

HIV-1 envelope replication and α4β7 utilization among newly infected subjects and their corresponding heterosexual partners

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIV-1 envelope replication and α4β7 utilization among newly infected subjects and their corresponding heterosexual partners
Published in
Retrovirology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-10-162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Pena-Cruz, Behzad Etemad, Nikolaos Chatziandreou, Phyu Hninn Nyein, Shannon Stock, Steven J Reynolds, Oliver Laeyendecker, Ronald H Gray, David Serwadda, Sandra J Lee, Thomas C Quinn, Manish Sagar

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that active selection limits the number of HIV-1 variants acquired by a newly infected individual from the diverse variants circulating in the transmitting partner. We compared HIV-1 envelopes from 9 newly infected subjects and their linked transmitting partner to explore potential mechanisms for selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,770,397
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#734
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,645
of 306,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#32
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.