↓ Skip to main content

Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and incidence of type 2 diabetes in Japanese men and women: the Japan public health center-based prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and incidence of type 2 diabetes in Japanese men and women: the Japan public health center-based prospective study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shino Oba, Akiko Nanri, Kayo Kurotani, Atsushi Goto, Masayuki Kato, Tetsuya Mizoue, Mitsuhiko Noda, Manami Inoue, Shoichiro Tsugane

Abstract

Japanese diets contain a relatively high amount of carbohydrates, and its high dietary glycemic index and glycemic load may raise the risk of diabetes in the Japanese population. The current study evaluated the associations between the dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in a population based cohort in Japan.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 22%
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 14 11%
Lecturer 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 32 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,306,441
of 22,420,435 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#538
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,330
of 309,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#58
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,420,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.