You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and incidence of type 2 diabetes in Japanese men and women: the Japan public health center-based prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shino Oba, Akiko Nanri, Kayo Kurotani, Atsushi Goto, Masayuki Kato, Tetsuya Mizoue, Mitsuhiko Noda, Manami Inoue, Shoichiro Tsugane, For the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Group |
| Abstract |
Japanese diets contain a relatively high amount of carbohydrates, and its high dietary glycemic index and glycemic load may raise the risk of diabetes in the Japanese population. The current study evaluated the associations between the dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in a population based cohort in Japan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,396,339
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#550
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,588
of 306,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.