↓ Skip to main content

Sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy: clinico-pathological characteristics and review of 76 cases

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy: clinico-pathological characteristics and review of 76 cases
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13023-017-0640-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas J. Schnitzler, Tobias Schreckenbach, Aleksandra Nadaj-Pakleza, Werner Stenzel, Elisabeth J. Rushing, Philip Van Damme, Andreas Ferbert, Susanne Petri, Christian Hartmann, Antje Bornemann, Andreas Meisel, Jens A. Petersen, Thomas Tousseyn, Dietmar R. Thal, Jens Reimann, Peter De Jonghe, Jean-Jacques Martin, Peter Y. Van den Bergh, Jörg B. Schulz, Joachim Weis, Kristl G. Claeys

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Other 8 9%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Neuroscience 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,293,099
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#139
of 3,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,007
of 330,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.