↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional intervention and physical training in malnourished frail community-dwelling elderly persons carried out by trained lay “buddies”: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional intervention and physical training in malnourished frail community-dwelling elderly persons carried out by trained lay “buddies”: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E Dorner, Christian Lackinger, Sandra Haider, Eva Luger, Ali Kapan, Maria Luger, Karin E Schindler

Abstract

In elderly persons frailty and malnutrition are very common and can lead to serious health hazards such as increased mortality, morbidity, dependency, institutionalization and a reduced quality of life. In Austria, the prevalence of frailty and malnutrition are increasing steadily and are becoming a challenge for our social system. Physical training and adequate nutrition may improve this situation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 77 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 55 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 19%
Sports and Recreations 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 94 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,382,310
of 24,833,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,735
of 16,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,152
of 318,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#49
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.