↓ Skip to main content

Current status and perspectives of patient-derived xenograft models in cancer research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
383 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current status and perspectives of patient-derived xenograft models in cancer research
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13045-017-0470-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunxin Lai, Xinru Wei, Shouheng Lin, Le Qin, Lin Cheng, Peng Li

Abstract

Cancers remain a major public health problem worldwide, which still require profound research in both the basic and preclinical fields. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are created when cancerous cells or tissues from patients' primary tumors are implanted into immunodeficient mice to simulate human tumor biology in vivo, which have been extensively used in cancer research. The routes of implantation appeared to affect the outcome of PDX research, and there has been increasing applications of patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models. In this review, we firstly summarize the methodology to establish PDX models and then go over recent application and function of PDX models in basic cancer research on the areas of cancer characterization, initiation, proliferation, metastasis, and tumor microenvironment and in preclinical explorations of anti-cancer targets, drugs, and therapeutic strategies and finally give our perspectives on the future prospects of PDX models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 383 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 16%
Researcher 62 16%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 98 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 101 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 11%
Engineering 18 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 117 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,291,036
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#436
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,771
of 310,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#17
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.