↓ Skip to main content

Tocotrienols for normalisation of hepatic echogenic response in nonalcoholic fatty liver: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tocotrienols for normalisation of hepatic echogenic response in nonalcoholic fatty liver: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrico Magosso, Mukhtar Alam Ansari, Yogheswaran Gopalan, Ibrahim Lutfi Shuaib, Jia-Woei Wong, Nurzalina Abdul Karim Khan, Mohamed Rizal Abu Bakar, Bee-Hong Ng, Kah-Hay Yuen

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the commonest liver disorders. Obesity, insulin resistance, lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress have been identified amongst the possible hits leading to the onset and progression of this disease. Nutritional evaluation of NAFLD patients showed a lower-than-recommended intake of vitamin E. Vitamin E is a family of 8 isoforms, 4 tocopherols and 4 tocotrienols. Alpha-tocopherol has been widely investigated in liver diseases, whereas no previous clinical trial has investigated tocotrienols for NAFLD. Aim of the study was to determine the effects of mixed tocotrienols, in normalising the hepatic echogenic response in hypercholesterolaemic patients with ultrasound-proven NAFLD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 20%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,378,430
of 23,463,424 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#374
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,391
of 309,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,463,424 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.