↓ Skip to main content

The murine lung microbiome in relation to the intestinal and vaginal bacterial communities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The murine lung microbiome in relation to the intestinal and vaginal bacterial communities
Published in
BMC Microbiology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-13-303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth Klingenberg Barfod, Michael Roggenbuck, Lars Hestbjerg Hansen, Susanne Schjørring, Søren Thor Larsen, Søren Johannes Sørensen, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt

Abstract

This work provides the first description of the bacterial population of the lung microbiota in mice. The aim of this study was to examine the lung microbiome in mice, the most used animal model for inflammatory lung diseases such as COPD, cystic fibrosis and asthma.Bacterial communities from broncho-alveolar lavage fluids and lung tissue were compared to samples taken from fecal matter (caecum) and vaginal lavage fluid from female BALB/cJ mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 192 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 24%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,760,583
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#80
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,427
of 319,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.