↓ Skip to main content

Science review: Extracellular acidosis and the immune response: clinical and physiologic implications

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Science review: Extracellular acidosis and the immune response: clinical and physiologic implications
Published in
Critical Care, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2900
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A Kellum, Mingchen Song, Jinyou Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 175 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 54 30%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,751,999
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,376
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,482
of 50,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.