↓ Skip to main content

Blood flow-restricted exercise in space

Overview of attention for article published in Extreme Physiology & Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood flow-restricted exercise in space
Published in
Extreme Physiology & Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-7648-1-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle J Hackney, Meghan Everett, Jessica M Scott, Lori Ploutz-Snyder

Abstract

Prolonged exposure to microgravity results in chronic physiological adaptations including skeletal muscle atrophy, cardiovascular deconditioning, and bone demineralization. To attenuate the negative consequences of weightlessness during spaceflight missions, crewmembers perform moderate- to high-load resistance exercise in conjunction with aerobic (cycle and treadmill) exercise. Recent evidence from ground-based studies suggests that low-load blood flow-restricted (BFR) resistance exercise training can increase skeletal muscle size, strength, and endurance when performed in a variety of ambulatory populations. This training methodology couples a remarkably low exercise training load (approximately 20%-50% one repetition maximum (1RM)) with an inflated external cuff (width, ranging between approximately 30-90 mm; pressure, ranging between approximately 100-250 mmHg) that is placed around the exercising limb. BFR aerobic (walking and cycling) exercise training methods have also recently emerged in an attempt to enhance cardiovascular endurance and functional task performance while incorporating minimal exercise intensity. Although both forms of BFR exercise training have direct implications for individuals with sarcopenia and dynapenia, the application of BFR exercise training during exposure to microgravity to prevent deconditioning remains controversial. The aim of this review is to present an overview of BFR exercise training and discuss the potential usefulness of this method as an adjunct exercise countermeasure during prolonged spaceflight. The work will specifically emphasize ambulatory BFR exercise training adaptations, mechanisms, and safety and will provide directions for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 19%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 51 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,126,055
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#84
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,937
of 290,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.