↓ Skip to main content

Where is the patient in models of patient-centred care: a grounded theory study of total joint replacement patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Where is the patient in models of patient-centred care: a grounded theory study of total joint replacement patients
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Webster, Anthony V Perruccio, Richard Jenkinson, Susan Jaglal, Emil Schemitsch, James P Waddell, Samantha Bremner, Melanie Hammond Mobilio, Viji Venkataramanan, Aileen M Davis

Abstract

Patient-centered care ideally considers patient preferences, values and needs. However, it is unclear if policies such as wait time strategies for hip and knee replacement surgery (TJR) are patient-centred as they focus on an isolated episode of care. This paper describes the accounts of people scheduled to undergo TJR, focusing on their experience of (OA) as a chronic disease that has considerable impact on their everyday lives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Psychology 13 10%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,951,112
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,723
of 7,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,576
of 306,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#33
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.