↓ Skip to main content

Impact of methodological "shortcuts" in conducting public health surveys: Results from a vaccination coverage survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of methodological "shortcuts" in conducting public health surveys: Results from a vaccination coverage survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth T Luman, Mariana Sablan, Shannon Stokley, Mary M McCauley, Kate M Shaw

Abstract

Lack of methodological rigor can cause survey error, leading to biased results and suboptimal public health response. This study focused on the potential impact of 3 methodological "shortcuts" pertaining to field surveys: relying on a single source for critical data, failing to repeatedly visit households to improve response rates, and excluding remote areas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%