↓ Skip to main content

Causes of discomfort in the academic workplace and their associations with the different burnout types: a mixed-methodology study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes of discomfort in the academic workplace and their associations with the different burnout types: a mixed-methodology study
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Montero-Marín, Javier Prado-Abril, José Miguel Carrasco, Ángela Asensio-Martínez, Santiago Gascón, Javier García-Campayo

Abstract

Burnout is the result of prolonged workplace exposure to chronic stress factors and may present itself in one of the following subtypes: "frenetic", "under-challenged" and "worn-out". The aims of the present study were to identify the causes of workplace discomfort that affect employees in large organizations and to determine the predictive power of these causes with regard to the burnout subtypes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 22%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Psychology 13 16%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 14 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,385,534
of 15,821,424 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,595
of 10,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,758
of 266,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#139
of 1,087 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,821,424 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,087 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.