Title |
Cattle genome-wide analysis reveals genetic signatures in trypanotolerant N’Dama
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12864-017-3742-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Soo-Jin Kim, Sojeong Ka, Jung-Woo Ha, Jaemin Kim, DongAhn Yoo, Kwondo Kim, Hak-Kyo Lee, Dajeong Lim, Seoae Cho, Olivier Hanotte, Okeyo Ally Mwai, Tadelle Dessie, Stephen Kemp, Sung Jong Oh, Heebal Kim |
Abstract |
Indigenous cattle in Africa have adapted to various local environments to acquire superior phenotypes that enhance their survival under harsh conditions. While many studies investigated the adaptation of overall African cattle, genetic characteristics of each breed have been poorly studied. We performed the comparative genome-wide analysis to assess evidence for subspeciation within species at the genetic level in trypanotolerant N'Dama cattle. We analysed genetic variation patterns in N'Dama from the genomes of 101 cattle breeds including 48 samples of five indigenous African cattle breeds and 53 samples of various commercial breeds. Analysis of SNP variances between cattle breeds using wMI, XP-CLR, and XP-EHH detected genes containing N'Dama-specific genetic variants and their potential associations. Functional annotation analysis revealed that these genes are associated with ossification, neurological and immune system. Particularly, the genes involved in bone formation indicate that local adaptation of N'Dama may engage in skeletal growth as well as immune systems. Our results imply that N'Dama might have acquired distinct genotypes associated with growth and regulation of regional diseases including trypanosomiasis. Moreover, this study offers significant insights into identifying genetic signatures for natural and artificial selection of diverse African cattle breeds. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
Sweden | 1 | 7% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Egypt | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 22% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |