You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Four distinct types of dehydration stress memory genes in Arabidopsis thaliana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-13-229 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Ding, Ning Liu, Laetitia Virlouvet, Jean-Jack Riethoven, Michael Fromm, Zoya Avramova |
| Abstract |
How plants respond to dehydration stress has been extensively researched. However, how plants respond to multiple consecutive stresses is virtually unknown. Pre-exposure to various abiotic stresses (including dehydration) may alter plants' subsequent responses by improving resistance to future exposures. These observations have led to the concept of 'stress memory' implying that during subsequent exposures plants provide responses that are different from those during their first encounter with the stress. Genes that provide altered responses in a subsequent stress define the 'memory genes' category; genes responding similarly to each stress form the 'non-memory' category. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 363 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 23% |
| Researcher | 68 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 192 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 19% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 87 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,504,184
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#120
of 3,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,195
of 308,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#7
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.